Formatting page ...
To, The Superintending Engineer (EI) Iron Ore Handling Plant Paradip Port Trust, Sub: - Providing Assistance in Stacker-Cum-Reclaimer-II of IOHP Ref: - Work Order No: EM/IOHP/GW-29/14/393 Dt: 15/04/2015 Dear Sir, In obedience to your letter No: EM/IOHP/GW-29/14/1060 dtd: 07 October, 2015, we are to inform you the following facts for favour of your information & kind consideration. That, the work of Providing Assistance in Stacker-Cum-Reclaimer-II work of IOHP was awarded to us vide work order No: EM/IOHP/GW-29/14/393, Dt: 15/04/2015 in our lowest quoted rates. That, we have given an undertaking as per TCN after complying with our techno commercial information and eligibility criteria which is placed at page No.232 of the agreement. That, we have already complied with contractors obligation which is mentioned at page No.75 of the agreement. That, we have made the contract which the workers for three years individually which is binding, failing which it may lead for litigation and industrial dispute. That, we have invested huge money as obligatory and supplied PPES & statutory payment of HRA, Bonus, allowances etc. to the workers That, we have invested huge amount towards purchase of tools, plants machinery, purchase material for machine and consumable for the rectification, modification new fabrication and shutdown work of mechanical, Electrical, Hydraulic and Lubrication system for the said work. That, we have not made any agreement with the Unions as instructions given at para-31.0 of page No.78 of the agreement. But it is a fear that the unions may involve in industrial Dispute, if the workers will not be continued and paid their wages as per agreement made. That, we have complied with all statutes and regulations as made in para-16.0 at page No.65 of the agreement. That, all the workers engaged are covered under EPF & ESI benefits and if the work is kept abeyance penalty from EPF & ESI Authorities will be imposed which will be against the rules and regulation of this country.
|
